by José Alejandro Coronado and Roberto Veneziani
There may be rising concern in regards to the growing emphasis on journal rankings in academia. That is of particular consequence in economics: given theoretical and methodological cleavages, heterodox shops are typically marginalised in conventional rating programs.
Regardless of this, journal rankings are used and will certainly be helpful. In a current paper, we explored tips on how to construct a rating that appropriately displays the fame of heterodox economics journals amongst heterodox economists (Coronado and Veneziani, 2025).
We aren’t the primary ones to construct rankings for heterodox economics journals. Fred Lee and others (e.g., Lee et al., 2010; Cronin, 2020) developed heterodox economics journal rankings primarily based on subjective peer evaluations mixed with bibliometric indicators. These composite “high quality” indices had the target of measuring analysis high quality within the heterodox economics neighborhood.
In distinction, we measure fame and mental affect throughout the heterodox economics neighborhood by focusing solely on bibliometric indicators. Thus, we seize the views of the heterodox economics neighborhood via their quotation selections.
To construct our rating we require, first, a instrument to rank journals primarily based on bibliometric information. We undertake the Palacios-Huerta and Volij (2004) (PV) index — a theoretically-founded measure of mental affect inside quotation networks. In contrast to easy quotation counts or affect elements, the PV index accounts for each the amount and the status of citations acquired, capturing the recursive construction of mental affect.
From a Broad Set of Journals to the Core
Second, we have to establish the set of journals to rank. That is simpler stated than executed, missing a transparent, broadly shared notion of heterodox and even heterodox-adjacent shops. We start by specializing in a complete listing of journals: we begin from the set of shops used within the influential research by Lee et al. (2010) and add a spread of further journals recognized in newer contributions (e.g., Gräbner et al., 2018; Kapeller and Springholz, 2016). After excluding shops with lacking quotation information, our database covers 119 journals and over half one million citations between 2000 and 2023.
Whereas we do derive a rating of this massive set of journals primarily based on the PV index (Desk 1 within the paper), a more in-depth take a look at the construction of the quotation community raises some doubts on all rankings that concentrate on broad, complete definitions of heterodox economics. For, the community construction is extraordinarily sparse: journals type internally cohesive teams, however these teams barely cite one another. Certainly, the community successfully splits into two virtually disconnected subnetworks. It’s unclear that these journals bear a sufficiently shut household resemblance to rank them collectively.
To beat this drawback, we comply with an inductive method: we use neighborhood detection strategies to let the quotation information reveal which journals are actively a part of the heterodox mental dialog, and we establish a tightly related group of 14 journals, which we time period the Heterodox Economics Core.
The Restricted Rating: Outcomes and Interpretation
The primary desk under (Desk 3 within the paper) presents the rating of the Heterodox Economics Core, utilizing the PV index primarily based on citations from the previous 5 years.
A number of issues are value noting: The Evaluation of Keynesian Economics, based solely in 2012, ranks first, indicating its exceptional rise in affect throughout the heterodox neighborhood. Established journals such because the Cambridge Journal of Economics, Metroeconomica and the Journal of Put up Keynesian Economics stay extremely ranked. Journals just like the Evaluation of Radical Political Economics and Journal of Financial Points rank decrease than is likely to be anticipated primarily based on casual reputations.
Maybe surprisingly, some shops typically related to heterodox economics — comparable to Feminist Economics and Evaluation of Social Economic system — don’t belong to the Heterodox Economics Core. Our neighborhood detection evaluation exhibits that they belong to a separate cluster — which we name Social Economics and Inequality — with comparatively weak quotation hyperlinks to the Heterodox Economics Core. However, given their relevance in the neighborhood, we construct an prolonged rating that features these shops, and the opposite journals of their cluster, along with the core 14 journals.
The expanded rating is proven within the desk under (Desk A1 within the paper) and it’s instantly evident that the addition of those journals doesn’t make a significant distinction.
Past the static rating, Determine 2 within the paper traces the evolution of journal affect (for journals within the Heterodox Economics Core) from 2008 to 2023. It exhibits that important shifts have occurred: RoKE has steadily gained floor, whereas the affect of Cambridge Journal of Economics, Metroeconomica, Evaluation of Political Economic system, and Journal of Put up Keynesian Economics has considerably declined over time.
These outcomes are fairly putting. As a result of sturdy community externalities in quotation communities, one would count on that over time established journals cement their place as central nodes within the community, reinforcing their affect via cumulative benefit. But, the info reveal a extra dynamic panorama inside heterodox economics, the place newer journals can rise quickly, and established shops can lose floor — suggesting that mental management within the subject stays actively contested relatively than ossified.
References
Coronado, J.A. and Veneziani, R. (2025). “Heterodox Economics Journals: A Community Evaluation,” Metroeconomica.
Cronin, B. (2020). “Journal Rankings and Heterodox Economics.” Journal of Financial Points.
Gräbner, C., et al. (2018). “In the direction of a Pluralist Rating of Heterodox Economics Journals.” Evaluation of Political Economic system.
Kapeller, J. and Springholz, F. (2016). Listing of Heterodox Economics Journals (sixth ed.).
Lee, F.S., et al. (2010). “Analysis High quality Rankings of Heterodox Financial Journals.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology.
Palacios-Huerta, I. and Volij, O. (2004). “The Measurement of Mental Affect.” Econometrica.
José Alejandro Coronado is Lecturer in Economics on the College of Greenwich.
Roberto Veneziani is Professor of Economics at Queen Mary College of London.
