Regulatory Replace: Nationwide Affiliation of Insurance coverage Commissioners Spring 2025 Nationwide Assembly

3. NAIC Actions Concerning Prescription Drug Protection and Pharmacy Profit Administration

New CCPA Regs: Half 2: Client Requests

9 May 2025

Ninth Circuit Reshapes Private Jurisdiction Requirements for E-Commerce Platforms in Briskin v. Shopify

8 May 2025

The NAIC applied modifications to its actions relating to prescription drug protection and pharmacy profit administration. Particularly, the NAIC (i) modified the identify of its Pharmaceutical Profit Administration Regulatory Points (B) Working Group to the Prescription Drug Protection (B) Working Group, which is targeted on prescription drug protection points, and (ii) established a brand new Pharmacy Profit Administration (D) Working Group targeted on pharmacy profit administration enforcement points.

4. NAIC Takes Motion Concerning Varied Funding-Monitoring Actions

Through the Spring Assembly, the Valuation of Securities Activity Power (VOS Activity Power) uncovered amendments to the Functions and Procedures Guide (P&P Guide) to require that (i) personal ranking letter rationale experiences be filed inside 90 days of an affirmation, replace, or change, and (ii) personal ranking letter rationale experiences possess analytical substance. The VOS Activity Power additionally heard an replace on the standing of the collateralized mortgage obligation (CLO) modeling undertaking. As well as, the Danger-Primarily based Capital Funding Danger and Analysis (E) Working Group (RBCIRE Working Group) acquired an replace on the progress of updating the risk-based capital (RBC) remedy for sure bond funds.

a. VOS Activity Power Considers P&P Guide Updates Concerning Non-public Letter Ranking Rationale Studies

The VOS Activity Power uncovered amendments to the P&P Guide to require that (i) personal ranking letter rationale experiences be filed inside 90 days of an affirmation, replace, or change and (ii) personal ranking letter rationale experiences possess analytical substance. Since January 1, 2024, personal letter rated (PLR) securities have typically required a corresponding personal ranking letter rationale report back to be eligible for an NAIC Designation to be assigned by means of the submitting exemption (FE) course of. The proposed amendments have been uncovered for a 30-day public remark interval ending April 25, 2025.

The primary of the proposed amendments is meant to make clear when a personal ranking letter rationale report must be filed with the NAIC Securities Valuation Workplace (SVO) to stop a safety from turning into ineligible for the FE course of and the associated FE-derived NAIC Designation from being deactivated. The SVO advisable that the VOS Activity Power permit a grace interval of 90 days from the date of any ranking motion for a brand new or up to date personal ranking letter rationale report back to be filed with the SVO. If the personal ranking letter rationale report will not be filed throughout that point, the PLR safety would grow to be ineligible for the FE course of till such time because the SVO receives the personal ranking letter rationale report associated to such ranking motion.

The second of the proposed amendments is meant to make clear what is anticipated for a personal ranking letter rationale report filed with the SVO. The SVO famous that it has acquired personal ranking letter rationale experiences that don’t appropriately clarify the “evaluation of the credit score, authorized and operational dangers and mitigants supporting the assigned” ranking, as required by the P&P Guide. In consequence, the SVO advisable that the VOS Activity Power require insurers to file a full personal ranking letter rationale report that incorporates ample analytical substance to allow an unbiased occasion to type an opinion as to the funding threat for any ranking motion, even when the insurance policies of the credit standing supplier (CRP) don’t require a full evaluation.

events supplied oral feedback noting that the requirement to offer up to date rationale experiences on an annual foundation imposes an pointless burden on insurers and that, as an alternative, CRPs might transmit the personal ranking letter rationale report on to the SVO on a “machine to machine” foundation, with insurers turning into concerned solely within the occasion that an exception happens. The VOS Activity Power invited all events to offer written feedback through the public remark interval.

The SVO additionally supplied an replace on the elimination from the FE technique of PLR securities with no required personal ranking letter rationale report, noting that on March 3, 2025 (following a three-month deferral interval from year-end 2024), the NAIC eliminated 346 PLR securities. This quantity displays a major enhance in compliance with the necessities; as not too long ago as November 11, 2024, the SVO had recognized 1,636 PLR securities lacking the required rationale report.

b. VOS Activity Power Discusses Updates on CLO Modeling Challenge

The VOS Activity Power heard an replace on the standing of the CLO modeling undertaking. The VOS Activity Power beforehand adopted an modification to the P&P Guide, which turned efficient January 1, 2025, so as to add reporting directions for the monetary modeling of CLOs. Particularly, the P&P Guide modification makes CLOs ineligible to make use of CRP rankings to find out an NAIC Designation if the NAIC Structured Securities Group can mannequin the safety. The P&P Guide modification was launched after the NAIC Funding Evaluation Workplace recognized that NAIC Designations assigned to CLOs have been inconsistent when counting on CRP rankings and advisable this modification to make sure reporting equivalency for NAIC regulatory functions.

The advert hoc group main this effort is in search of business suggestions on the algorithm and methodology and held an open assembly on April 2, 2025. The advert hoc group additionally maintains a webpage on which it posts supplies associated to the event of its methodology, analytics, and supplemental data.

c. NAIC Receives an Replace on RBC Rules for Bond Funds

Through the Spring Assembly, the RBCIRE Working Group acquired an replace on the progress of updating the RBC remedy for sure bond funds. The RBCIRE Working Group heard feedback on the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) RBC Rules for Bond Funds Presentation and the NAIC Memorandum of Bond Funds Reported in 2023 Annual Assertion Filings. The publicity focuses on the RBC remedy amongst three kinds of funds after they predominantly put money into bonds and obtain SVO assigned designations: (i) exchange-traded funds, (ii) U.S. Securities and Change Fee–registered mutual funds, and (iii) personal funds. The ACLI agreed with the RBCIRE Working Group to start taking a look at these three kinds of bond funds to find out whether or not the chance profiles warrant comparable or totally different RBC remedy. The ACLI uncovered draft RBC rules for these bond funds in a presentation in December 2024.

The NAIC and business representatives have been in settlement on the rules proposed by the ACLI, and the RBCIRE Working Group directed NAIC employees to start drafting a proposal targeted on updating the Life RBC components. Whereas discussions up to now have been targeted on the appliance of those RBC rules to life firms solely, events additionally raised whether or not utility for non-life insurers must be thought-about, significantly in mild of the brand new RBC Governance Activity Power want for consistency throughout RBC formulation (see merchandise 6(c), beneath). It’s not anticipated that this proposal will probably be a high precedence for the RBCIRE Working Group, so work will probably lengthen past 2025.

5. NAIC Progresses Revisions to Statements of Statutory Accounting Rules

On the Spring Assembly, the Statutory Accounting Rules (E) Working Group (SAP Working Group) (i) adopted clarifications to statutory accounting steering to: (x) require restricted asset disclosure for modified coinsurance (Modco) and funds withheld (FWH) property reported inside a ceding firm’s monetary statements and (y) present granular reporting strains for collateral loans and (ii) uncovered the next SAP ideas and clarifications to statutory accounting steering: (x) revisions to broaden the restricted property reporting to seize data on Modco and FWH property which can be associated to the reinsurer and to require the disclosure in all quarterly and annual monetary statements and (y) revisions to the annual assertion blanks to seize data on Modco/FWH property. The SAP Working Group additionally directed NAIC employees to analysis doable steering for sure nonaccounting efficient derivatives to defer realized features and losses, contemplate the usage of Delaware statutory trusts to carry residential mortgage loans, and develop revisions to make clear steering for securities lending, repurchase, and reverse repurchase agreements. Lastly, the SAP Working Group acquired an replace on the work of the IMR Advert Hoc Group.

a. SAP Working Group Adopts Collateral Mortgage Reporting Revisions

On the Spring Assembly, the SAP Working Group adopted revisions to broaden the collateral mortgage reporting strains for Schedule BA and asset valuation reserve (AVR) directions to allow regulators to shortly determine the kind of collateral supporting the collateral mortgage with a purpose to determine whether or not the collateral mortgage could also be admitted in scope of SSAP No. 21 — Different Admitted Property. The NAIC beforehand adopted revisions to SSAP No. 21 to make clear that for a collateral mortgage to be admitted, the underlying collateral should even be a qualifying funding (that means the collateral can be an admitted asset if held immediately by the corporate). As such, these revisions require disclosure as as to if the collateral mortgage must be admitted or nonadmitted based mostly on the character of the underlying collateral. The revisions are efficient January 1, 2026, however stay topic to a associated Blanks (E) Working Group proposal to Schedule BA and AVR that’s pending adoption.

Below the revisions to Schedule BA, collateral loans will probably be separated by the kind of collateral that secures the mortgage. The updates add the next reporting strains: (i) collateral loans backed by mortgage loans, (ii) collateral loans backed by joint ventures, partnerships, or restricted legal responsibility firms, (iii) collateral loans backed by residual pursuits, (iv) collateral loans backed by debt securities, (v) collateral loans backed by actual property, and (vi) all others not in any other case captured in (i) – (v) above. The Blanks (E) Working Group revisions additionally embrace two electronic-only columns to report the truthful worth of the collateral backing the collateral mortgage and the proportion of collateral to the quantity of the mortgage.

Relatedly, in June 2024, the NAIC Life Danger-Primarily based Capital (E) Working Group adopted interim modifications that present for look-through remedy for collateral loans secured by mortgage loans to be handled as Schedule BA mortgages, starting year-end 2024. The NAIC has said that in 2025 it should proceed to think about the extent to which look-through remedy ought to apply for RBC functions to collateral loans secured by different kinds of underlying collateral. These reporting strains are targeted on classes for which look-through to underlying collateral for AVR and risk-based capital functions is warranted.

b. SAP Working Group Updates Concerning Funds Withheld and Modco Insurance coverage Asset Reporting

The SAP Working Group adopted revisions to SSAP No. 1 — Accounting Insurance policies, Dangers & Uncertainties, and Different Disclosures to make clear how property held underneath Modco or FWH agreements are mirrored inside the restricted asset disclosure. The SAP Working Group additionally uncovered for a public remark interval ending Might 2, 2025, (i) revisions to SSAP No. 1 to broaden the restricted asset reporting to seize data on Modco and FWH property associated to the reinsurer and to require the disclosure in all quarterly and annual monetary statements and (ii) beforehand uncovered draft reporting schedules so as to add a brand new half to the reinsurance schedules (Schedule S of the Life/Fraternal annual assertion clean) so as to add reporting on FWH and Modco property.

The revisions to SSAP No. 1 adopted on the Spring Assembly have been uncovered on the NAIC Fall 2024 Nationwide Assembly. events advisable minor modifications to the revisions to make clear that the book-adjusted carrying worth (fairly than collateral quantity or truthful worth) of the Modco and FWH property must be mirrored within the restricted property disclosure. These suggestions have been accepted by the working group. It’s anticipated that corresponding monetary assertion blanks updates will probably be adopted on Might 29, 2025, to permit for year-end 2025 data-capturing.

The extra revisions to SSAP No. 1 uncovered on the Spring Assembly have been ready in response to a referral from the Monetary Evaluation (E) Working Group, which famous that FWH and Modco reinsurance preparations usually contain the switch of funding advisory tasks to the reinsurer or its affiliate and will embrace a subsequent reallocation of a signification portion of the property into securities which can be affiliated with or associated to the funding adviser or reinsurer. The revisions are meant to require insurers to obviously determine whether or not such investments are associated to or affiliated with the reinsurer, as such relationship data could not in any other case be readily obvious to regulators. Though the restricted asset disclosure is at present up to date on an annual foundation, the SAP Working Group has proposed requiring this reporting in all quarterly monetary statements as properly.

The SAP Working Group has proposed a year-end 2025 efficient date for the proposed revisions to SSAP No. 1, such that up to date restricted asset reporting can be required for year-end 2025 statutory monetary statements. To the extent the modifications aren’t adopted earlier than the tip of Might 2025, disclosure might nonetheless be required for year-end 2025, though such disclosure can be narrative solely till year-end 2026.

The draft reporting schedules including reporting on FWH and Modco property have been initially uncovered on the NAIC Summer time 2024 Nationwide Assembly and re-exposed on the NAIC Fall 2024 Nationwide Assembly. In response to feedback from events, the SAP Working Group has eliminated the Well being and Property/Casualty and Title annual assertion blanks from the proposal because of the restricted applicability of Modco and FWH transactions to nonlife enterprise.

Relatedly, on the Spring Assembly, the Life Danger-Primarily based Capital (E) Working Group proposed modifications to reorganize the LR008 – Different Lengthy-Time period Property statutory monetary assertion web page to make sure that Schedule BA property of the identical threat parts (C-1o vs. C1-cs) are grouped to facilitate correct Modco/FWH changes inside LR008. Ought to the proposed modifications for LR008 be adopted, there will probably be corresponding modifications to the next statutory monetary assertion pages: (i) LR030 – Calculation of Tax Impact for Life and Fraternal Danger-Primarily based Capital and (ii) LR031 – Calculation of Approved Management Stage Danger-Primarily based Capital. The proposal was topic to a 30-day public remark interval ending April 23, 2025.

c. SAP Working Group Resumes Work on Proposal to Make clear Steering on Deferral of Positive factors and Losses for By-product Transactions

On the Spring Assembly, the SAP Working Group directed NAIC employees to start researching and growing doable steering to make clear disposal and reacquisition reporting necessities on the funding acquisition and disposal schedules when a debt safety is bought after which reacquired from a particular goal automobile with added by-product wrappers or parts. In consequence, NAIC employees will probably be soliciting data as as to if new statutory accounting steering must be established that may permit the deferral of features and losses for by-product transactions that don’t qualify as accounting-effective hedges underneath SSAP No. 86 — Derivatives.

The proposal had been deferred on the NAIC Fall 2024 Nationwide Assembly. That model included a proposal for the bifurcation of debt securities with by-product wrappers or parts if the merchandise doesn’t mirror a structured notice, however events didn’t assist the change and argued that insurers who personal a lot of these devices ought to consider the debt funding in its entirety to find out if the principles-based bond definition has been met. After contemplating the feedback from events, the SAP Working Group agreed that these debt securities must be topic to the bond definition with out by-product bifurcation (such that, if they don’t qualify as bonds, they are going to be reported as nonbond debt securities).

NAIC employees anticipates that the steering could also be complicated however will work to current updates and drafts to the SAP Working Group for consideration in that case directed. It’s anticipated that to the extent possible, NAIC employees could leverage steering and the method in SSAP No. 108 — Derivatives Hedging Variable Annuity Ensures. It’s anticipated that ultimate steering would require ample guardrails on the kinds of hedging methods, proving effectiveness, and mechanisms for the regulators, all which will probably be parts of the dialogue in accounting steering improvement if directed by the SAP Working Group.

d. SAP Working Group Defers Additional Work on Idea Agenda Merchandise on Accounting and Reporting of Funding Subsidiaries

The SAP Working Group deferred additional motion on its idea agenda merchandise relating to the accounting and reporting of funding subsidiaries to permit for additional consideration of Delaware statutory trusts (DSTs) holding residential mortgage loans and whether or not particular accounting parameters and steering must be established.

This agenda merchandise was initially uncovered on the NAIC Fall 2024 Nationwide Assembly, in response to considerations with the reporting of “funding subsidiaries” in Schedule D-6-1: Valuation of Shares of Subsidiary, Managed, or Affiliated Firms and within the life RBC components, significantly with regard to the potential RBC profit that may happen with out transparency to regulators on the property inside an “funding subsidiary.”

Following the NAIC Fall 2024 Nationwide Assembly, events indicated that the important thing business focus is on growing accounting and reporting steering for DST buildings holding residential mortgage loans. In consequence, the SAP Working Group has directed NAIC employees to evaluate DST buildings holding residential mortgage loans and the potential institution of particular accounting and reporting steering. Within the meantime, the SAP Working Group invited events to alert NAIC employees to every other particular buildings captured as “funding subsidiaries” on Schedule D-6-1 that warrant separate evaluation.

As soon as the SAP Working Group reaches a choice for residential mortgage loans held in DSTs (probably with new SAP steering addressing construction necessities, accounting, and reporting), it’s anticipated that the idea of a generic “funding subsidiary” can be faraway from Schedule D-6-1 and associated RBC formulation. Going ahead, if there are buildings for which look-through RBC is desired, NAIC employees recommends that events carry these buildings to the eye of the SAP Working Group for evaluation.

e. SAP Working Group Proceeds With Revisions on Securities Lending, Repurchase, and Reverse Repurchase Preparations

The SAP Working Group will proceed with growing revisions to make clear steering for securities lending, repurchase, and reverse repurchase agreements set forth in SSAP No. 103 — Transfers and Servicing of Monetary Property and Extinguishments of Liabilities to make clear RBC steering for securities lending, repurchase, and reverse repurchase agreements.

This agenda merchandise was initially uncovered in August 2024, requesting suggestions from regulators and events on the documented processes and noting questions associated to current RBC steering for securities lending, repurchase, and reverse repurchase agreements because it was famous that sure elements of the present steering could not have been related and/or constantly utilized.

Specifically, the construction of SSAP No. 103 was famous as not being simple to observe because the steering for “secured borrowing” underneath typically accepted accounting rules, which have been adopted in SSAP No. 103, is totally different from the statutory accounting methodology for securities lending and repurchase secured borrowing transactions when the secured occasion has the flexibility to promote or repledge collateral. The steering will give attention to, amongst different matters, (i) current steering restrictions (e.g., limiting admittance to short-term repurchase preparations), (ii) the appliance of the “conforming” securities lending idea for lowered RBC, and (iii) the usage of the detailed repurchase disclosures.

f. SAP Working Group Discusses Curiosity Upkeep Reserve Issues

Through the Spring Assembly, the SAP Working Group heard an replace on the work of the IMR Advert Hoc Subgroup charged with growing long-term curiosity upkeep reserve (IMR) steering.

On the NAIC Summer time 2023 Nationwide Assembly, the SAP Working Group adopted INT 23-01T – Web Unfavorable (Disallowed) Curiosity Upkeep Reserve, an interpretation of statutory accounting rules that gives elective, limited-term steering for the admittance of web unfavourable (disallowed) IMR underneath SSAP No. 7 for as much as 10% of adjusted normal account capital and surplus. INT 23-01T is efficient by means of December 31, 2025, however could also be nullified earlier or prolonged based mostly on actions by the SAP Working Group to determine particular accounting steering on web unfavourable (disallowed) IMR to function a long-term answer. The SAP Working Group will probably be reviewing this timeline and assessing this interpretation.

The IMR Advert Hoc Subgroup has been assembly usually since October 2023. For the reason that NAIC Fall 2024 Nationwide Assembly, the discussions have targeted on (i) IMR from reinsurance transactions, (ii) reinvestment for bought fixed-income devices the place a realized achieve/loss is taken to IMR, and (iii) steering for extra withdrawals. Future consideration is anticipated on yield assessments, supporting an enchancment to asset yield when reinvestment happens. Though the IMR Advert Hoc Subgroup has informally concluded its discussions on hypothetical IMR, additional dialogue on different reinsurance elements is anticipated to proceed.

6. NAIC Offers Updates on Holistic Framework for Insurer Investments

The Monetary Situation (E) Committee (E Committee) supplied updates on the implementation of its Framework for Regulation of Insurer Investments — A Holistic Overview (Funding Framework), an up to date draft of which was uncovered in August 2024. Updates included NAIC progress towards hiring a advisor to develop a due diligence framework for CRPs, proposed modifications to the E Committee’s subcommittee construction, and the formation of the RBC Mannequin Governance (EX) Activity Power.

a. NAIC to Rent Advisor to Develop Due Diligence Framework for CRPs

In accordance with the Funding Framework, in 2024 the E Committee adopted a request for proposal for the NAIC to rent a advisor to help with growing a due diligence framework for oversight of rankings supplied by CRPs. On the Spring Assembly, the E Committee introduced its intention to “quickly announce” the hiring of the advisor and for the work to start on growing a CRP due diligence framework underneath the path of the VOS Activity Power.

The E Committee’s purpose in hiring the advisor is to scale back or get rid of the SVO’s “blind” reliance on CRPs. The due diligence framework to be developed would allow SVO to focus totally on holistic due diligence round CRP utilization and can embrace, amongst different issues, clear quantitative and qualitative parameters for CRPs used to offer rankings to be used as NAIC designations.

b. NAIC to Appoint Funding-Targeted Working Group

Additionally on the Spring Assembly, the E Committee mentioned its intention to announce modifications to sure elements of its subcommittee construction in addition to modifications within the function of sure NAIC employees in aiding regulators. In accordance with the Funding Framework, these modifications are anticipated to incorporate the institution of a broad funding working group underneath the E Committee that may act in an advisory capability to assist the Monetary Evaluation (E) Working Group and the Valuation Evaluation (E) Working Group, amongst different NAIC process forces and dealing teams.

Though the E Committee doesn’t anticipate to offer further updates on the proposed modifications till the NAIC 2025 Summer time Nationwide Assembly, the Funding Framework means that funding processes on which the brand new working group could advise embrace (i) evaluation of bond reporting evaluation underneath the principles-based bond definition, (ii) challenges to particular person designations supplied by CRPs, and (iii) evaluation of labor supplied by exterior consultants for investment-related initiatives for broad impacts to the Funding Framework.

c. NAIC Establishes New RBC Governance Activity Power

In February 2025, the NAIC established a brand new Danger-Primarily based Capital Mannequin Governance (EX) Activity Power (RBC Governance Activity Power). The said purpose of the RBC Governance Activity Power is to modernize and strengthen the RBC framework, with the purpose to develop guiding rules for future RBC changes, conduct a complete hole evaluation to determine areas for enchancment, and design a communication marketing campaign highlighting the RBC formulation’ strengths within the U.S. state-based system of monetary regulation and solvency oversight. The RBC Governance Activity Power can also be tasked with evaluating when to combine new dangers into the RBC formulation, the information wanted for setting related elements, and approaches for addressing rising dangers when a framework didn’t beforehand exist. Moreover, it should evaluation established pointers for recalibrating RBC formulation to make sure the formulation stay efficient.

The duty power was shaped as a part of the broader NAIC 2025 strategic roadmap and the RBC parts of the Funding Framework. On February 9, 2025, the RBC Governance Activity Power uncovered a memorandum detailing the duty power’s preliminary directives and key tasks and proposed 2025 fees. On the Spring Assembly, the RBC Governance Activity Power heard feedback to the memorandum from events on the path of the duty power’s work.

The co-chairs of the RBC Governance Activity Power famous that the NAIC will probably be hiring a advisor to help with the duty power’s work and supply evaluation and goal experience, assist carry out the hole evaluation, and develop guiding rules. The co-chairs of the RBC Governance Activity Power inspired events to ship suggestions and particular responses to the questions within the February 9 memorandum to offer a helpful start line for the advisor to start their work. The duty power intends to offer common updates and expose related paperwork as its work progresses.

7. NAIC Revisits Limitations on Disclosure of RBC

In April 2024, the Capital Adequacy (E) Activity Power (CATF) launched a draft proposal that may revise the RBC Preamble, a doc that describes the aim of RBC, how it’s calculated, and the way it helps regulators determine firms with insufficient capital ranges. Whereas the RBC Preamble at present offers limits on the general public use of RBC, the proposal would, amongst different issues, delineate further examples of prohibited public disclosure of RBC ranges “together with however not restricted to, press releases, earnings releases, webcast supplies, or every other earnings displays or webcasts.” This proposal conflicts with historic disclosure practices and sure accounting and regulatory necessities related to insurance coverage firms. Primarily based on suggestions from events on these current practices, in June 2024, CATF postponed additional publicity of the RBC Preamble revisions. Nevertheless, on the Spring Assembly, CATF re-exposed the proposal with modifications based mostly on feedback beforehand acquired.

The RBC Preamble already incorporates language proscribing the general public use of RBC, stating that “the making, publishing, disseminating, circulation or putting earlier than the general public, or inflicting, immediately or not directly to be made, revealed, disseminated, circulated or place earlier than the general public, in a newspaper, journal or different publication, or in a type of a discover, or in every other manner, an commercial, announcement or assertion.” Nevertheless, it has been the observe of many firms to publish RBC data in sure public disclosure paperwork, significantly given the general public availability of this data within the insurer’s annual statutory monetary statements filed with state insurance coverage regulators, and different events have since come to make use of such data. As such, one of many questions included within the draft publicity is whether or not modifications must be made to the RBC disclosures included within the five-year Historic Knowledge web page in Annual Assertion Blanks. The publicity additionally features a request for examples of ways in which RBC ratios are used apart from the meant functions of figuring out probably weakly capitalized firms. Feedback on the publicity are due by Might 9, 2025.

8. NAIC to Develop Updates to Regulatory Framework for the Use of Synthetic Intelligence Techniques

On the Spring Assembly, the Large Knowledge and Synthetic Intelligence (H) Working Group mentioned its subsequent steps with regard to the regulatory framework for the usage of synthetic intelligence (AI) techniques, together with the event of AI threat analysis instruments and enhancing regulatory oversight and accountability.

In response to NAIC information, as of March 3, 2025, 23 jurisdictions had adopted a model of the NAIC Mannequin Bulletin on the Use of Synthetic Intelligence Techniques by Insurers (AI Mannequin Bulletin). Following up on these adoptions, in 2024 the working group started discussions to discover how states are assessing market and monetary threat related to an insurance coverage firm’s use of AI, together with compliance with the AI Mannequin Bulletin. In 2025, the working group expects to (i) develop a standardized information assortment software to make use of in investigations or examinations to assist regulators determine and assess monetary and market threat related to AI use, (ii) coordinate the event of evaluation and enforcement instruments, assets, pointers, and coaching for regulators, and (iii) create a self-audit questionnaire for insurers that aligns with regulator expectations on AI use underneath the AI Mannequin Bulletin.

The working group additionally mentioned a few of the normal ideas it expects to deal with by means of the event of additional steering:

AI Governance (finest practices, steering, and templates; AI testing; mannequin coaching; drift detection; figuring out opposed client outcomes; threat classification)
AI Transparency (AI use disclosure; information use disclosure; diploma of “human within the loop” disclosure; foundation, supply of knowledge, purpose for determination; offering recourse to enchantment or
repair inaccurate information; AI grievance monitoring)
Hostile Outcomes Accountability (make clear accountability when utilizing third-party information/fashions; opposed client final result reporting to customers and regulators)
Prohibited Practices (determine AI use instances that require “human within the loop”)

The working group expects to take a holistic method to refining AI expectations in these areas, and to deal with these ideas in coordination with different NAIC committees and dealing teams. Presently, the working group has not but decided the shape that additional steering will take (mannequin bulletin, mannequin regulation, or in any other case).