![Exit Music (For a [Foreign] Movie)](https://www.theautonewspaper.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/https3A2F2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com2Fpublic2Fimages2F8e38d8b7-034b-4eaf-8322-d6975613e853_918x750.png)
Donald Trump is pointing at issues and threatening to tariff them, once more.
And whereas “tariffing international movies” might have figured barely decrease on individuals’s predicted hit listing, it most likely shouldn’t have been.
Or to place it one other means: International nations present tax incentivies to persuade Hollywood to make movies of their nation fairly than within the US.
Does that sound like one thing the Donald would instincitively like?
Over on Bluesky, Simon Lester, has additionally reminded everybody that the concept of tariffing movies isn’t new: Again in 2007, when movies had been nonetheless (largely) transported on bodily movie reel, videotapes or DVDs, the Movie & Tv Motion Committee (FTAC) filed a Part 301 petition searching for an investigation into the legality of international authorities movie and TV subsidies designed to draw American productions, with a deal with Canada.
Admittedly, tariffing internet knowledge is barely extra sophisticated than tariffing videotapes, so there could also be some logistical points related to Trump’s 100% tariff menace.
However assuming he simply would possibly do one thing, I believe it’s price eager about what that might truly appear like.
Off the highest of my head (and never accounting for whether or not any of those can be doable/authorized beneath US legislation), listed here are issues he may do that may have an analogous influence:
-
Tariff related items. Assuming the primary intention is definitely to cease international nations from offering tax incentives and grants, he may simply determined to use a load of recent tariffs on vaguely related merchandise (I dunno, stage curtains) till stated nations cease granting the tax incentives and grants.
-
Tax international content material. Look, this might be an entire mess however you could possibly concenivably apply 100% tax to studios that produce >XX% of content material exterior of the US. Alternatively, you could possibly apply 100% tax to the studio income linked to international manufacturing.
-
Ban international movies. Does what it says on the tin.
-
Native content material requirement. Related vibe to a few of the above, however you could possibly require that for a movie to be positioned in the marketplace within the US a sure proportion of its manufacturing/filming/and many others be carried out within the US.
-
Cultural quotas. Time to get a bit extra European. He may require that each one cinemas, television stations, streamers, and many others, present American-produced movies and exhibits XX% of the time.
-
Trump display screen time. With an enormous hat tip to David Allen Inexperienced on Bluesky, this made me chuckle:
Or not one of the above.
In essence, what I’m saying is that individuals ought to deal with this significantly and keep away from the temptation to say “You’ll be able to’t tariff a movie, you IDIOT” as a result of … he would possibly simply do this.
All collectively now …
The place are movies from?
Staying on the subject of tariffing movies, if the US had been to tariff international movies, and notably if it had been to use totally different tariffs to movies from totally different nations (e.g., France 100%, Japan 50%, and many others.), we would want to assume significantly concerning the origin of a movie.
Lengthy-term readers of MFN will know that I by no means miss an alternative to jot down about guidelines of origin. Right now is not any totally different.
Now, after we focus on origin it’s normally in relation to items. Beneath each non-preferential (exterior of a free commerce settlement) and preferential (lined by a free commerce settlement) regimes, there are guidelines dictating the last word origin of an imported product. Getting this proper might be vital, notably if it’s the distinction between a, for instance, 10 per cent tariff and a 145 per cent tariff.
However whereas nobody ever actually talks about it, figuring out the place a service is imported from will also be vital. For instance, through a rustic’s free commerce agreements, some companies suppliers from FTA nations would possibly be capable of bid for sure authorities contracts whereas different companies suppliers from non-FTA nations won’t.
Anyhow, the TL;DR is that that is an space the place vibes run free.
From a US perspective, it’s price how the origin of different companies has been decided, notably within the context of procurement.
Particularly, this Follow Legislation briefing highlights the US’s deal with the place a international vendor or contracter is both headquartered or established.
The briefing additionally gives this Cloud Computing case research:
Anyway, my guess if the movie tariff is ever applied is that there’s both some particular guidelines centered on labour hours or the like within the US vs exterior the US or it simply will get very vebsey in a short time.
Finest,
Sam
You might also like
Donald Trump is pointing at issues and threatening to tariff them, once more.
And whereas “tariffing international movies” might have figured barely decrease on individuals’s predicted hit listing, it most likely shouldn’t have been.
Or to place it one other means: International nations present tax incentivies to persuade Hollywood to make movies of their nation fairly than within the US.
Does that sound like one thing the Donald would instincitively like?
Over on Bluesky, Simon Lester, has additionally reminded everybody that the concept of tariffing movies isn’t new: Again in 2007, when movies had been nonetheless (largely) transported on bodily movie reel, videotapes or DVDs, the Movie & Tv Motion Committee (FTAC) filed a Part 301 petition searching for an investigation into the legality of international authorities movie and TV subsidies designed to draw American productions, with a deal with Canada.
Admittedly, tariffing internet knowledge is barely extra sophisticated than tariffing videotapes, so there could also be some logistical points related to Trump’s 100% tariff menace.
However assuming he simply would possibly do one thing, I believe it’s price eager about what that might truly appear like.
Off the highest of my head (and never accounting for whether or not any of those can be doable/authorized beneath US legislation), listed here are issues he may do that may have an analogous influence:
-
Tariff related items. Assuming the primary intention is definitely to cease international nations from offering tax incentives and grants, he may simply determined to use a load of recent tariffs on vaguely related merchandise (I dunno, stage curtains) till stated nations cease granting the tax incentives and grants.
-
Tax international content material. Look, this might be an entire mess however you could possibly concenivably apply 100% tax to studios that produce >XX% of content material exterior of the US. Alternatively, you could possibly apply 100% tax to the studio income linked to international manufacturing.
-
Ban international movies. Does what it says on the tin.
-
Native content material requirement. Related vibe to a few of the above, however you could possibly require that for a movie to be positioned in the marketplace within the US a sure proportion of its manufacturing/filming/and many others be carried out within the US.
-
Cultural quotas. Time to get a bit extra European. He may require that each one cinemas, television stations, streamers, and many others, present American-produced movies and exhibits XX% of the time.
-
Trump display screen time. With an enormous hat tip to David Allen Inexperienced on Bluesky, this made me chuckle:
Or not one of the above.
In essence, what I’m saying is that individuals ought to deal with this significantly and keep away from the temptation to say “You’ll be able to’t tariff a movie, you IDIOT” as a result of … he would possibly simply do this.
All collectively now …
The place are movies from?
Staying on the subject of tariffing movies, if the US had been to tariff international movies, and notably if it had been to use totally different tariffs to movies from totally different nations (e.g., France 100%, Japan 50%, and many others.), we would want to assume significantly concerning the origin of a movie.
Lengthy-term readers of MFN will know that I by no means miss an alternative to jot down about guidelines of origin. Right now is not any totally different.
Now, after we focus on origin it’s normally in relation to items. Beneath each non-preferential (exterior of a free commerce settlement) and preferential (lined by a free commerce settlement) regimes, there are guidelines dictating the last word origin of an imported product. Getting this proper might be vital, notably if it’s the distinction between a, for instance, 10 per cent tariff and a 145 per cent tariff.
However whereas nobody ever actually talks about it, figuring out the place a service is imported from will also be vital. For instance, through a rustic’s free commerce agreements, some companies suppliers from FTA nations would possibly be capable of bid for sure authorities contracts whereas different companies suppliers from non-FTA nations won’t.
Anyhow, the TL;DR is that that is an space the place vibes run free.
From a US perspective, it’s price how the origin of different companies has been decided, notably within the context of procurement.
Particularly, this Follow Legislation briefing highlights the US’s deal with the place a international vendor or contracter is both headquartered or established.
The briefing additionally gives this Cloud Computing case research:
Anyway, my guess if the movie tariff is ever applied is that there’s both some particular guidelines centered on labour hours or the like within the US vs exterior the US or it simply will get very vebsey in a short time.
Finest,
Sam
