Everybody who watches hockey is aware of {that a} second time beyond regulation interval can be significantly better than the shootout. However the NHL hasn’t gone for this but, maybe as a result of it worries that followers nonetheless just like the shootout, or maybe as a result of the gamers don’t need further time beyond regulation intervals that might improve their workload and threat of damage.
If both of those are the explanation why we nonetheless have shootouts as a substitute of second overtimes, then listed here are a couple of various concepts which may overcome these objections:
- No gamers who performed in 1st OT are allowed to play within the 2nd OT
The highest-line gamers who play in OT would no longer have to fret about working extra or getting injured in a 2nd OT. As an alternative, the third and fourth line gamers, who in any other case hardly ever get an opportunity to play in OT, would get an opportunity to shine.
- Decrease the minimal variety of shooters within the shootout from 3 to 1
A one-shooter minimal shootout can be over extra shortly, which is an efficient factor as a result of the shootout is anti-climactic and comparatively boring. It might even be extra thrilling, since it could put extra stress on the shooter and make every shot try extra necessary.
- Lastly, and maybe essentially the most gimmicky, however nonetheless my favorite: have the goalie put on gloves on each fingers, and not carry a goalie stick, in 2nd OT.
That is what bandy and discipline hockey goalies do. It too would are likely to make the sport finish extra shortly, and would in all probability result in extra highlight-reel saves
